Reuters reports that, “A battle is brewing in the court of public opinion and in Congress over whether US passengers should be allowed to use cell phones in-flight as many foreign airlines now permit but which critics say is unsafe and annoying.”
Just what we need to make matters…er..uh…, more interesting, Congress is trying to involve itself!
Read the rest of the story here.
Heads up! We received word yesterday that Allegiant Air plans to stop accepting cash payments at the counter, effective the first of September. Debit or credit card only…
The cat is out of the bag. This morning Expedia announced it’s bringing up to 500 new jobs to Springfield and they’ll be working at the old airport terminal. Earlier this year the Airport and Expedia announced that the company would lease about 59,000 square feet of the building, but job details were left for today. Most of the jobs will be customer service and accounting related. If you’re interested in applying visit this Expedia web site.
Leasing the old terminal is important to the airport because it generates a revenue stream that is not related to aviation. This is especially important in today’s uncertain economy because the aviation industry is extremely volatile. Non-aviation related revenue helps make up the difference when airline revenue is down. In the big scheme of things, non-aviation related revenue can make it easier for the Airport to keep operating costs down for the airlines.
The Expedia lease is initially for five years, with the option of five, 3-year extensions. The total annual lease amount: $450,760.00.
“Domestic airfares jumped 4.7 percent to an average $328.12 in the first quarter compared with the same period in 2009, the first year-over-year increase since late 2008. However, average airfares are still $20 below their high for a first quarter, set in 2001…”
That word comes today from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Read more from the Dallas Morning News.
If you REALLY want to get into in, check out all the numbers on the BTS web site.
Continental Airlines has confirmed it’s testing a self boarding procedure at Houston Intercontinental Airport. In other words, instead of having an airline employee scan your boarding pass and then allow you to board the plane, you’ll have to do it yourself.
That’s the gist of a story today in USA Today. The paper writes, “The Transportation Security Administration, which is in charge of air security, “determined it does not impact the security of the traveling public,” says Greg Soule, a TSA spokesman, adding all passengers are screened at airport checkpoints prior to arriving at boarding gates.”
Read the rest of the story here.
I’m not sure why, exactly, but this story about Southwest Airlines reminds me of a Mother Goose nursery rhyme…
Jack Sprat
Could eat no fat,
His wife could eat no lean;
And so,
Betwixt them both,
They licked the platter clean.
July marked the beginning of a project to update the airport’s master plan. What is a master plan?
It’s a planning document that looks into the future and tries to predict what will happen at the airport—how many passengers will use the airport ten years from now? In 20 years? What kind of infrastructure improvements will the airport need to make and when? It really boils down to three main questions: 1) what infrastructure improvements will the airport need in the future? 2) When will the improvements be needed? 3) How will the improvements be paid for?
Airport master plans are written by companies that specialize in airport planning. It’s their job to write an objective, fact based plan. The firm updating our master plan is Jviation. The total cost of the plan: $707,819.00. The airport pays $35,391.00 of that total, with the rest picked up by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
If that price tag makes your head spin, stand in line. But that’s what it costs to bring in the specialized skills required to do airport master planning analysis. And the FAA isn’t likely to help pay for future improvements unless there’s a plan in place.
Airport master plans are typically reviewed and updated about every 20 years. Our airport’s first master plan was completed in 1967. It was updated in 1977 and 1993.
How is the master plan used?
When you get right down to it a master plan helps you stay ahead of the curve. The airport reviews the master plan on a regular basis to see how the plan’s projections compare with reality. Hypothetical example: suppose the plan projects that an additional parking lot will be needed when the airport has one million passengers a year. As time goes on, and as passenger numbers approach one million, the airport will know, with help from the master plan, that it’s time to start building the additional parking lot.
There a couple of things that a master plan isn’t. It’s not a wish list for future air service There’s nothing the airport can do, from an infrastructure point of view, that will entice an airline to fly from Springfield to New York City. Airline service decisions are mainly driven by the population of the metropolitan area, per capita income, demand, and airline economics.
Here’s another thing a master plan isn’t: it’s not a wish list for airport improvements. The plan merely tells you at what point you’ll need to make improvements.
During the next 18 months we’ll be talking a lot about the master plan…stay tuned.
The camera is looking north. The gift shop was to the immediate left; the ticket counters were along the new sheet rock seen on the left. We're told that Expedia plans to leave in most of the old terminal signs (like the one in this photo).
The rebirth of the airport’s old passenger terminal continues. These photos were taken last week and show the extensive interior renovations made by the travel company Expedia. The Internet travel company leased about two-thirds of the old terminal in February and plans to move in later this year. The remainder of the building is leased to the Missouri National Guard.
Camera is looking west. The main screening check point was to the right. The restaurant entrance was to the left.
Seth wants to know…
“I looked on Wikipedia, so I dont know if this is factual, but I looked at branson airport and it says they fly to 12 cities now. And I know Springfield flies to 12 airports, so will Branson have an effect of Springfield?, because they fly to some big cities like Houston and Indianapolis.”
There’s no doubt that the Branson airport has affected the Springfield airport. The trick is figuring out exactly how and how much. Simple logic tells us that the Branson airport has flown people who otherwise would have used the Springfield airport. But since we saw passenger growth last year…well…apparently not very many Springfield airport customers flew from Branson. This year our passenger numbers are flat.
Bottom line, I think a post on this subject from March 2009 still hold true: http://mobile.flyspringfield.com//blog/?p=836
Fares have been going up up up since the first year. Now, we may be seeing the first signs of a downward trend. Here’s a sample of some low Springfield fares spotted this week.
Shop early. It’s a virtual certainty that the number of low priced seats is small.
